Blog #10
| CRITERIA | 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | Comments |
| Introduction – sufficiently forecasted the remainder of the essay | X | ||||||
| Conclusion – sufficiently wrapped up the author’s thoughts; connected to intro. | X | ||||||
| In-text Citations | X | Non-existant, nothing to back up information given. | |||||
| Works Cited/References – only work actually cited in the paper is included; properly formatted. | X | Non-existant | |||||
| Grammar/Mechanics – language choice; punctuation; spelling, etc. | X | Choppy poor word choise | |||||
| Flow – transitions between paragraphs; all sentences in a paragraph related; no run-on or fragmented sentences. | X | Very choppy structure, poorly organized, doesn’t follow a single train of thought. | |||||
| Hooked and maintained reader
interest. |
X | Hooked very well but did not maintain, to cluttered. | |||||
| Genre – Met the needs of the intended genre. | X | ||||||
| TOTAL = 20/40 | Add’l comments: Very choppy and that made for a hard read through. Also gave off the impression of talking to a pseudo-intellectual which turned me off and I found it hard to keep interest with lack of flow.
Actual word file:Rubric |
||||||
Advertisement
